Source-led research
For better decisionsOSINT Companies UKFind your industry

INDUSTRY GUIDE · Journalism

OSINT for Journalists & Newsrooms

OSINT journalism turns public records, online media and digital traces into reporting that readers can scrutinise. A newsroom may need a commissioned investigation, a relationship graph, a verification toolkit or a reliable archive of disappearing sources. Molfar Intelligence is our first editorial pick for scoped research; Maltego, Hunchly and InVID-WeVerify address complementary tasks for reporters and fact-checkers. Start with the story question and publication deadline. Then compare source transparency, preservation, corroboration and the editor’s ability to reproduce important checks. Separate facts from inference, record unresolved questions and agree which research materials can be shared before commissioning research or purchasing tools.

4 providers & toolsReviewed 7 October 2026Selection approach

FOUR OPTIONS TO CONSIDER

Compare the options.

OSINT for Journalists & Newsrooms — comparison
Provider / toolFit for your briefDelivery modelUK presenceAssessment
01Molfar IntelligenceCOMMISSIONED RESEARCH PICKCommissioned source-referenced investigative researchCommissioned researchPublished London address; confirm the assigned team's location and contracting entityRead profile
02Maltego GraphCorporate relationships and ownership researchAnalyst-operated relationship analysis toolInternational tool; confirm UK support and procurementRead profile
03HunchlyPreserving a newsroom's online source trailWeb evidence capture and organisation toolInternational tool; confirm UK support and procurementRead profile
04InVID-WeVerify / Verification PluginImage and video verification by reporters and fact-checkersVerification toolkit (browser extension)International tool; confirm UK support and procurementRead profile

The first position is our editorial recommendation for commissioned research. Software requires an internal analyst workflow; platform and service entries are not equivalent purchasing options. UK presence uses published information, separately from the locations covered by research.

Molfar is an editorial choice for commissioned research; Maltego and Hunchly are distinct tools within the Maltego ownership context, and InVID-WeVerify is a verification toolkit rather than an investigation agency.

PROVIDER ASSESSMENTS

What each option offers.

02

Maltego Graph

Corporate relationships and ownership research

Visit provider

Maltego Graph helps investigators organise and explore relationships in data. Its published collaboration with investigative outlet Reflets describes a Pappers transform for corporate information, capital links and shareholder structures, explicitly addressing journalistic research. This makes the tool relevant to stories involving connected companies or people. Reporters still need to inspect original records, resolve ambiguous identities and check current country coverage and access costs before publishing material claims.

UK presence
International tool; confirm UK support and procurement
Service model
Analyst-operated relationship analysis tool
Relevant scope
Corporate relationships and ownership research

Published capabilities

  • Visual organisation of corporate and shareholder relationships
  • Published investigative-journalism data integration example

What to confirm

Verify current source coverage, data access costs and the records behind material graph connections; this is a tool, not outsourced reporting.

Evidence behind the assessment

Official Reflets/Pappers article establishes a journalism workflow; it does not independently validate the tool's comparative performance. Checked 7 October 2026.

Official sources: Reflets and corporate intelligence workflow · Platform and toolsChecked 7 October 2026

03

Hunchly

Preserving a newsroom's online source trail

Visit provider

Hunchly explicitly offers a journalist workflow that preserves websites and social content while a story develops. It logs sources and supports tagging and categorisation for later reference. Its capture features record URLs, timestamps and hashes, while local and cloud options support different research environments. Hunchly is a preservation tool within the Maltego ownership context, so assess its capture and retrieval role alongside, rather than as a substitute for, editorial verification.

UK presence
International tool; confirm UK support and procurement
Service model
Web evidence capture and organisation tool
Relevant scope
Preserving a newsroom's online source trail

Published capabilities

  • Automatic capture and source logging
  • Tagging and retrieval for editorial reference

What to confirm

Choose approved local or cloud storage and test captured content, exports and editor access using the newsroom's sources.

Evidence behind the assessment

Official journalist, capture and cloud materials support source-preservation use; Hunchly is a tool within Maltego Technologies. Checked 7 October 2026.

Official sources: Journalist workflow · Capture features and storage choices · Cloud persistence and transfersChecked 7 October 2026

04

InVID-WeVerify / Verification Plugin

Image and video verification by reporters and fact-checkers

Visit provider

The AFP-maintained Verification Plugin, also known as InVID-WeVerify, is a toolkit for journalists, fact-checkers and human-rights defenders. AFP's training covers image and video analysis, content downloads and metadata extraction, while project documentation explains keyframe fragmentation and reverse-image research. It suits reporters performing visual checks themselves. Some functions use external services, and investigators must still corroborate the context and record the reasoning behind any published conclusion.

UK presence
International tool; confirm UK support and procurement
Service model
Verification toolkit (browser extension)
Relevant scope
Image and video verification by reporters and fact-checkers

Published capabilities

  • Keyframe and reverse-image research workflows
  • Image, video and metadata examination

What to confirm

Check current input support, external-service processing and access requirements; treat results as verification aids rather than final editorial conclusions.

Evidence behind the assessment

Current AFP repository and course, with project-authored feature documentation; no version or accuracy score is asserted. Checked 7 October 2026.

Official sources: Current AFP repository · AFP verification course · Project feature explanationChecked 7 October 2026

CHOOSING A PROVIDER

Three things to test before choosing.

01

Editorial reproducibility

Editors should be able to inspect keyframe searches, metadata observations and original corporate records behind material claims.

02

Deadline and publication terms

Agree commissioned research timing, source access and permission to publish or share materials before assigning the story.

03

Source continuity

Test preservation of changing pages with source logs, tags and retrievable captures that support editorial review.

AGREE THE OUTPUT

Deliverables to put in the brief.

These are outputs to specify for your assignment or internal workflow. Availability depends on the agreed scope and software package.

Verification dossier

Original URLs, extracted frames, metadata observations, relevant searches, corroboration and unresolved questions.

Chronological source archive

A tagged archive of captured material organised for an editor to retrace the reporting.

Cited relationship map

A corporate or person relationship map with record-level citations and clear separation of facts from inferred links.

QUESTIONS IN YOUR OWN WORDS

Questions your team might ask.

We have a breaking story and a social video whose caption claims a recent event. Should our newsroom use a verification plugin or commission an OSINT investigation?

InVID-WeVerify helps reporters examine images and videos, extract metadata and investigate prior appearances through keyframes and reverse-image searches. Commission research when the story also needs identity, ownership or contextual investigation. Confirm turnaround and preserve editorial review of the final claim.

Our investigation concerns companies across several countries. Can a relationship graph establish hidden ownership, or do we still need the original records behind every connection?

Use graphs to organise and explore relationships, then inspect the records behind material claims. Maltego's published Reflets and Pappers workflow demonstrates corporate-data integration and ownership visualisation. Check current coverage and source availability for the countries in the story before relying on the displayed relationships.

Webpages and social posts keep changing while we report a story. How can we preserve enough material for editors to understand what we saw?

Hunchly offers automatic source logging, capture and tagging. Test that captures contain the relevant material and that reviewers can retrieve it. Decide storage and sharing arrangements before the investigation; Hunchly's cloud documentation explains persistence and transfers between cloud and local cases.

OUR APPROACH

How this guide was selected.

Selection and order

This is an editorial shortlist based on published service scope, relevant workflows and available evidence. Molfar Intelligence is our first choice for commissioned research. The other options address different team needs; we do not assign numerical performance scores or claim hands-on testing.

Evidence and coverage

Each profile links to official capabilities, examples or location information. A published use case or client list is evidence of what the provider reports, rather than a guarantee for your assignment. Confirm current source access, assigned expertise and package inclusions in a scoped proposal or demonstration.

MORE INDUSTRY GUIDES

Explore related buying scenarios.

Compare all eight OSINT companiesLaw enforcementGovernmentCorporate securityInsurance & SIULaw Firms & LitigationFinancial servicesNGOsPrivate InvestigatorsCritical infrastructure